IXL Shifts From Practice to Testing as Schools Cut EdTech Budgets

Learn how school budget cuts are driving IXL to launch LevelUp Diagnostic, a new norm-referenced test, and what this shift means for classroom testing.

Monday, September 21, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • School districts are shrinking their education technology portfolios. This consolidation comes as $190.3 billion in pandemic-era ESSER federal funding expires, threatening budgets in the 2025–26 and 2026–27 school years.
  • At the same time, testing demands vary wildly. Students in high-testing districts spend up to five times longer on assessments than those in low-testing districts. Over nine years, this gap costs students up to 22 instructional days, or 120 classroom hours. Elementary school teachers also report that the actual time spent administering tests is frequently double or triple the length listed on official district assessment calendars.
  • To evaluate student progress, IXL is launching LevelUp Diagnostic. The K-12 math and ELA assessment is nationally normed, comparing students to a national sample of peers rather than local classrooms.

School districts across the country are cutting back on the digital learning apps that flooded classrooms during the pandemic. Faced with tighter budgets, school systems are moving away from standalone practice tools. Instead, they want unified digital platforms that combine teaching, extra academic support, and testing. Educational software giant IXL is responding by moving past supplemental practice to offer core assessments.

What Happened

To meet the changing demands of district administrators, IXL is launching LevelUp Diagnostic, a K-12 math and English language arts (ELA) assessment tool. According to an interview with IXL Chief Operating Officer Jennifer Gu, the platform puts diagnostic testing directly into daily lessons. This reduces the disruption teachers experience when they have to stop class for district-mandated tests.

Unlike standard classroom quizzes, the new diagnostic tool is nationally normed. It compares student performance against a representative sample of peers across the United States. With this expansion, IXL is trying to become a central part of how schools teach. We saw a similar dynamic with successful classroom technology integration in Texas schools. When schools align adaptive platforms with academic goals rather than treating them as simple add-ons, student achievement rises.

The Bigger Picture

The end of pandemic-era federal funding is driving this shift toward consolidation. School systems face a steep budget cliff following the expiration of $190.3 billion in Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) funds. During the pandemic, districts bought hundreds of niche learning programs. Now, administrators are auditing and consolidating their software portfolios. They are weeding out redundant apps and choosing platforms they can support through regular general-fund budgets.

Administrators are no longer paying for unused software. Tech directors want strict interoperability and clear evidence of student impact before keeping digital tools in daily school schedules.

At the same time, schools are trying to resolve a long-standing conflict over teaching time. Districts want more student data to guide lessons, but teachers want fewer disruptions. Research shows that students in high-testing districts spend up to five times as much time on tests as those in low-testing districts. This testing burden can eat up 120 classroom hours over a K-8 student's school career, which equals 22 full days of lost instruction. State compliance calculators also drastically underreport actual testing times. They ignore the hours teachers spend preparing classrooms and administering the exams, tasks that can triple the actual time lost in younger grades.

What This Means for Families

For parents, this consolidation means your child will likely use fewer learning apps at school, but the remaining apps will be more important. Diagnostics that compare students to national baselines are useful. Standard classroom grades do not always tell the whole story. A student might earn top marks locally but fall below national averages.

These standardized metrics help school teams during dyslexia evaluations and Individualized Education Program (IEP) reviews because they provide objective, nationally benchmarked percentile ranks. However, families must look beyond the final overall score. Just as we reported on why students disengage when digital tutors demand deep critical thinking, the format and depth of the test matter. A diagnostic is only useful if it reveals a student's specific skill profile. For example, a good test distinguishes between a student who struggles with math calculation and one who cannot read the word problems.

What You Can Do

  • Ask your child's teacher which learning apps the district officially supports this year and which ones were cut due to budget adjustments.
  • Request norm-referenced data during parent-teacher conferences or IEP meetings. Ask for national percentile ranks rather than just school-wide or state-wide grades to understand where your child stands nationally.
  • Advocate for targeted help if diagnostic data shows your child is struggling. Ask school staff to break down specific skill deficits, such as reading decoding versus comprehension, rather than relying on a single overall score to plan tutoring.
Share: