#WinAtSocial Program
Product by The Social Institute
Facts checked: Not yet checked
Our take (not a Learning Standard rating). This label applies to learning-science judgments throughout this overview.
Our take (not a Learning Standard rating)
While The Learning Standard has not yet formally evaluated #WinAtSocial, its focus on scenario-based learning and CASEL competencies suggests a solid foundation for teaching digital citizenship. It effectively uses timely, real-world examples to engage students, but actual skill acquisition depends heavily on how educators facilitate the provided discussion materials.
Pros
- Aligns lessons with evidence-based CASEL competencies to structure social-emotional learning goals.
- Incorporates monthly updates based on current events to maintain relevance and situational interest.
- Uses scenario-based discussions to encourage critical thinking and peer norming around digital dilemmas.
- Provides educators with real-time polling analytics to monitor student comprehension and wellbeing trends.
Cons
- Lacks independent, asynchronous practice modules for students to apply skills outside of the classroom environment.
- Relies entirely on the classroom teacher's ability to effectively facilitate complex and sensitive social discussions.
- Does not utilize spaced repetition software mechanics to ensure long-term retention of digital citizenship principles.
- Requires school or district-level commitment for pricing and implementation, making it inaccessible for individual parents.
What Do We Know About #WinAtSocial Program?
This program effectively teaches digital citizenship and healthy social media habits when facilitated by a skilled classroom teacher. Because The Learning Standard has not yet fully evaluated #WinAtSocial, we base our analysis on its instructional design, which relies heavily on group discussion rather than independent, software-based skill drilling. Your child will not sit alone in front of a screen answering multiple-choice questions about cyberbullying. Instead, they participate in peer-to-peer conversations guided by their teacher using the platform's timely, scenario-based prompts. The curriculum updates monthly to reflect current social media trends, which prevents the material from feeling outdated or irrelevant to your child's actual online life. By aligning with CASEL standards, the program targets core social-emotional competencies like self-awareness and responsible decision-making. However, parents should understand that this is a school-based intervention. You cannot purchase this for home use to correct your child's screen time habits. Its success depends entirely on the school's implementation and the classroom environment's psychological safety.
How Does #WinAtSocial Program Work?
#WinAtSocial uses guided, scenario-based social-emotional learning facilitated by a classroom educator. The web-based platform provides teachers with a dashboard of turnkey lessons that address digital wellbeing, social media use, and current cultural trends. During a lesson, the teacher projects the platform onto a shared screen to present a specific digital dilemma or current news event. Students then engage in structured discussions, analyzing the situation from multiple perspectives. The platform incorporates live polling and real-time feedback mechanisms, allowing students to vote on how they would handle specific online scenarios. This interactive element acts as a form of active retrieval, forcing students to articulate their reasoning and confront peer norms. The curriculum operates on an Understanding By Design framework, meaning lessons are built backward from desired learning outcomes. Because new lessons are pushed to the platform monthly, the instructional material constantly evolves alongside the digital landscape. Teachers also receive data insights on student responses to help identify macro-level wellbeing trends within the classroom.
Strengths and tradeoffs of #WinAtSocial Program
The biggest strength of #WinAtSocial is its highly relevant, continuously updated scenario-based curriculum, while its biggest weakness is the lack of structured spaced retrieval practice to ensure long-term behavior change. Real-world relevance drives student engagement here. By updating lessons monthly with current tech and cultural trends, the program avoids the common pitfall of digital citizenship curricula feeling detached from students' lived experiences. This immediate relevance leverages the learning science principle of situational interest, priming students to participate. Furthermore, its alignment with CASEL competencies ensures a structured approach to social-emotional development. However, from a cognitive science perspective, the program lacks mechanisms for long-term retention. Behavioral changes in digital habits require repeated exposure and practice over time. Without built-in spaced repetition or independent practice modules, students may understand a concept during a lively classroom discussion but fail to apply it when facing a real digital dilemma weeks later. The platform also places a high cognitive and pedagogical load on the educator; the quality of the guided discussions dictates the depth of learning, making outcomes highly variable between different classrooms.
Who Might Benefit From #WinAtSocial Program?
This platform is best for middle and high school administrators looking for a modern, discussion-based advisory curriculum to address digital citizenship. While listed for all ages, the focus on social media and cultural trends aligns most closely with adolescent development. It serves schools that want to move away from lecture-style cyberbullying assemblies toward continuous, peer-led conversations about technology. It is not suitable for individual parents seeking a home-based app to monitor or teach their child about screen time, nor is it ideal for schools lacking the dedicated advisory periods required to facilitate these deep discussions effectively.
Data Transparency
Does Not Meet Data Transparency Standard
#WinAtSocial Program does not meet our data transparency standard. Its privacy policy does not document basic protections, including a statement that it does not sell data, a commitment against targeted advertising and limits on sharing children's data.
8 of 35 checks passed
Evaluated September 2026
Privacy Policy →Level 1 · Basic protections
Does not sell data or target ads at students, limits sharing, and lets parents see and delete their child's data.
Not documented: a statement that it does not sell data, a commitment against targeted advertising, limits on sharing children's data, contractual limits on service providers, a COPPA or FERPA commitment, parents' right to see their child's data, parents' right to delete their child's data
Level 2 · Parent control (meets the standard)
Families can get their data out, know who processes it, and know how long it is kept.
Not documented: data export, a data retention timeline, self-service deletion
Level 3 · Direct data access
Families or schools can pull their own data through an API, in a stated format.
Not documented: an API for retrieving their own data, a named export format
View all 35 checks
Parent Access2/8
Does the policy mention parents specifically?
“As used in this Policy, “you” are an educator, school administrator, parent or guardian, or other adult user of our Platform (as defined below).”
Can parents view their child's data?
The policy excludes student information and sends parents to a separate student privacy notice, so it gives parents no right to view their child's data.
Can parents modify their child's data?
The policy excludes student information and gives parents no right to modify their child's data.
Can parents delete their child's account?
The policy only says the company will delete information collected from a child under 16 without verified parental consent; it gives parents no right to delete their child's data or account.
Is there a dedicated Children's Privacy section?
“Our Platform and our products and services are not intended to be used by children under 16 years of age, and no one under age 18 may provide any information to us or others on or using the Platform or otherwise.”
Does it reference COPPA compliance?
The policy does not mention COPPA.
Does it reference FERPA compliance?
The policy does not mention FERPA.
Is parental consent required for child accounts?
The policy bars children from using the covered platform and does not describe a parental-consent process for child accounts.
Data Portability1/5
Can users access their personal data?
“You can review, change, and request the deletion of certain portions of your Personal Information by sending us an e-mail at privacy@thesocialinst.com to request access to any Personal Information that you have provided to us, or to request to correct or delete that Personal Information.”
Can users download/export their data?
The policy offers access by request but does not mention downloading or exporting data.
Is there a self-service data access tool?
The policy handles access only through email requests, not a self-service tool.
Is a specific data format mentioned for export?
The policy does not mention an export format.
Is there an API for data access?
The policy does not mention an API for data access.
Data Minimization1/6
Is data collection itemized?
“Specifically, we (or our third-party service providers acting on our behalf) may collect the following:”
Can the app be used without a real name?
The policy says it collects users' full names.
Can the app be used without an email?
The policy says it collects users' email addresses.
Does it state collection is limited to what is necessary?
The policy does not say collection is limited to what is necessary.
Is IP address anonymized or truncated?
The policy says it collects IP addresses and does not mention anonymizing or truncating them.
Is location tracking explicitly excluded?
The policy says it collects users' geographic region and does not rule out location tracking.
Third-Party Protection2/7
Does it explicitly state no selling of data?
The policy only says the company does not "currently" sell data that triggers Nevada's opt-out statute, which is not a general promise not to sell data.
Are third-party providers named?
“We use Google Analytics to track and analyze certain traffic and usage statistics regarding the use of our Platform”
Are providers contractually restricted?
The policy does not say service providers are contractually limited in how they use data.
No-targeted-advertising commitment?
The policy says it uses personal information to show targeted ads on its platform and on third-party sites.
Is AI/ML data sharing addressed?
The policy does not address sharing data for AI or machine learning.
Child-specific sharing restriction?
The policy has no sharing restriction specific to children's data.
Cookies/tracking limited or opt-out?
“You can set your browser to refuse all or some browser cookies.”
Deletion & Retention1/5
Can users delete their account?
“so a request to delete certain forms of Personal Information may require the deletion of your account and cessation of services to you.”
Self-service deletion mechanism?
The policy handles deletion only through email requests.
Specific data retention timeline?
The policy does not give a specific retention period.
Auto-deletion of inactive accounts?
The policy does not mention automatically deleting inactive accounts.
Post-deletion handling described?
The policy does not describe how data is handled after deletion.
Advertising1/4
Advertising model explicitly disclosed?
“Personalizing your Platform experience and delivering content and promotional information related to your interests, including by delivering personalized e-mail content to you or by displaying targeted offers and ads to you on our Platform and third-party sites that you visit”
Free from third-party advertisements?
The policy describes showing ads and promotional content about third parties' products and does not say the product is ad-free.
Children excluded from ad targeting?
The policy does not exclude children from ad targeting; it just says the covered platform is not meant for children.
Ad-free option available?
The policy does not offer an ad-free option and describes advertising on the platform.
What This Means
The policy review did not meet our data transparency standard. The checks above show the documented findings and unknowns. A missing statement does not establish how the app handles data in practice.
About this evaluation: Based on automated analysis of Privacy Policy against 35 policy-disclosure questions, including questions adapted from the Common Sense Privacy Program's published evaluation questions. TLS is not affiliated with Common Sense Media, and this is not a Common Sense rating. Quoted text is copied from the policy; unquoted notes are our summary. Results describe what the policy documents, not the company's actual practices. Privacy policies can change: this review reflects the version we analyzed and does not determine legal compliance.
Sources and review method
TLS combines product information and editorial analysis to explain how #WinAtSocial Program works, its tradeoffs, and the questions to ask before choosing it. Product features, an instructional rationale and evidence of learning outcomes are different kinds of information.
Formal Learning Standard assessment: not yet completed. Data Transparency findings are reported separately and do not establish learning effectiveness. Read our methodology.
Frequently Asked Questions About #WinAtSocial Program
Is #WinAtSocial Program free?
No, #WinAtSocial Program is not free. It is an enterprise-level, school-wide curriculum that requires a paid district or school subscription. The Social Institute requires administrators to contact their sales team directly for a customized pricing quote based on student enrollment and implementation needs. It is not available as a direct-to-consumer purchase for individual parents or families.
Is #WinAtSocial Program good for middle and high schoolers?
Yes, #WinAtSocial Program is highly effective for middle and high school students. Older students often tune out outdated warnings about internet safety. This program succeeds by utilizing monthly updates that focus on current trends, social media platforms, and real news stories that adolescents actually care about. By elevating student voices and focusing on peer-to-peer discussion, it respects their developmental need for autonomy while guiding them toward healthier digital habits.
What does #WinAtSocial Program teach?
#WinAtSocial Program teaches digital citizenship, online safety, and social-emotional skills. It moves beyond basic internet safety rules to address complex modern issues like screen time management, digital footprint awareness, cyberbullying, and the mental health impacts of social media. The curriculum is mapped to CASEL competencies, meaning it explicitly teaches self-awareness, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making through the lens of modern technology use.
How does #WinAtSocial Program compare to traditional cyberbullying assemblies?
#WinAtSocial Program is significantly more effective than one-off cyberbullying assemblies. Learning science demonstrates that isolated, mass-instruction events rarely produce long-term behavioral changes. By contrast, this program embeds digital citizenship into the weekly or monthly school routine. This ongoing, scenario-based approach allows for deeper cognitive processing, peer norming, and continuous reinforcement of positive digital behaviors that a single yearly assembly simply cannot provide.
Has The Learning Standard evaluated #WinAtSocial Program?
TLS has not yet completed a Learning Standard evaluation of how well #WinAtSocial Program teaches. Its privacy policy has been reviewed for Data Transparency and does not yet document the basic protections (Level 1).
Is #WinAtSocial Program COPPA compliant?
A COPPA reference was not found in the reviewed privacy policy. This does not determine whether the app complies with COPPA. Policy review note: The policy does not mention COPPA.
Is #WinAtSocial Program FERPA compliant?
A FERPA reference was not found in the reviewed privacy policy. This does not determine whether the app complies with FERPA. Policy review note: The policy does not mention FERPA.
Does #WinAtSocial Program have a children's privacy policy?
The reviewed policy includes a dedicated children's privacy section. Policy review note: This text sits in a section headed "Children Under the Age of 16".
Does #WinAtSocial Program sell student data?
A statement ruling out data selling was not found in the reviewed policy. This does not establish that the app sells student data. Policy review note: The policy only says the company does not "currently" sell data that triggers Nevada's opt-out statute, which is not a general promise not to sell data.
Can you delete your data from #WinAtSocial Program?
The reviewed privacy policy describes account deletion. We have not tested the deletion process. Policy review note: Users can ask for their data to be deleted, which may include deleting the account.
Follow TLS Research
Subscribe to future TLS research updates: app reviews, findings, and what the evidence shows.
Screenshots
Take Action
For #WinAtSocial Program
If you represent The Social Institute and have a correction or new evidence, send the relevant source so we can review and update this page.
Submit a correction