#WinAtSocial Program
Product by The Social Institute
The Bottom Line
Partially. While The Learning Standard has not yet formally evaluated #WinAtSocial, its focus on scenario-based learning and CASEL competencies suggests a solid foundation for teaching digital citizenship. It effectively uses timely, real-world examples to engage students, but actual skill acquisition depends heavily on how educators facilitate the provided discussion materials.
Pros
- Aligns lessons with evidence-based CASEL competencies to structure social-emotional learning goals.
- Incorporates monthly updates based on current events to maintain relevance and situational interest.
- Uses scenario-based discussions to encourage critical thinking and peer norming around digital dilemmas.
- Provides educators with real-time polling analytics to monitor student comprehension and wellbeing trends.
Cons
- Lacks independent, asynchronous practice modules for students to apply skills outside of the classroom environment.
- Relies entirely on the classroom teacher's ability to effectively facilitate complex and sensitive social discussions.
- Does not utilize spaced repetition software mechanics to ensure long-term retention of digital citizenship principles.
- Requires school or district-level commitment for pricing and implementation, making it inaccessible for individual parents.
What Do We Know About #WinAtSocial Program?
This program effectively teaches digital citizenship and healthy social media habits when facilitated by a skilled classroom teacher. Because The Learning Standard has not yet fully evaluated #WinAtSocial, we base our analysis on its instructional design, which relies heavily on group discussion rather than independent, software-based skill drilling. Your child will not sit alone in front of a screen answering multiple-choice questions about cyberbullying. Instead, they participate in peer-to-peer conversations guided by their teacher using the platform's timely, scenario-based prompts. The curriculum updates monthly to reflect current social media trends, which prevents the material from feeling outdated or irrelevant to your child's actual online life. By aligning with CASEL standards, the program targets core social-emotional competencies like self-awareness and responsible decision-making. However, parents should understand that this is a school-based intervention. You cannot purchase this for home use to correct your child's screen time habits. Its success depends entirely on the school's implementation and the classroom environment's psychological safety.
How Does #WinAtSocial Program Work?
#WinAtSocial uses guided, scenario-based social-emotional learning facilitated by a classroom educator. The web-based platform provides teachers with a dashboard of turnkey lessons that address digital wellbeing, social media use, and current cultural trends. During a lesson, the teacher projects the platform onto a shared screen to present a specific digital dilemma or current news event. Students then engage in structured discussions, analyzing the situation from multiple perspectives. The platform incorporates live polling and real-time feedback mechanisms, allowing students to vote on how they would handle specific online scenarios. This interactive element acts as a form of active retrieval, forcing students to articulate their reasoning and confront peer norms. The curriculum operates on an Understanding By Design framework, meaning lessons are built backward from desired learning outcomes. Because new lessons are pushed to the platform monthly, the instructional material constantly evolves alongside the digital landscape. Teachers also receive data insights on student responses to help identify macro-level wellbeing trends within the classroom.
Strengths and tradeoffs of #WinAtSocial Program
The biggest strength of #WinAtSocial is its highly relevant, continuously updated scenario-based curriculum, while its biggest weakness is the lack of structured spaced retrieval practice to ensure long-term behavior change. Real-world relevance drives student engagement here. By updating lessons monthly with current tech and cultural trends, the program avoids the common pitfall of digital citizenship curricula feeling detached from students' lived experiences. This immediate relevance leverages the learning science principle of situational interest, priming students to participate. Furthermore, its alignment with CASEL competencies ensures a structured approach to social-emotional development. However, from a cognitive science perspective, the program lacks mechanisms for long-term retention. Behavioral changes in digital habits require repeated exposure and practice over time. Without built-in spaced repetition or independent practice modules, students may understand a concept during a lively classroom discussion but fail to apply it when facing a real digital dilemma weeks later. The platform also places a high cognitive and pedagogical load on the educator; the quality of the guided discussions dictates the depth of learning, making outcomes highly variable between different classrooms.
Who Might Benefit From #WinAtSocial Program?
This platform is best for middle and high school administrators looking for a modern, discussion-based advisory curriculum to address digital citizenship. While listed for all ages, the focus on social media and cultural trends aligns most closely with adolescent development. It serves schools that want to move away from lecture-style cyberbullying assemblies toward continuous, peer-led conversations about technology. It is not suitable for individual parents seeking a home-based app to monitor or teach their child about screen time, nor is it ideal for schools lacking the dedicated advisory periods required to facilitate these deep discussions effectively.
Data Transparency
Does Not Meet Data Transparency Standard
#WinAtSocial Program does not meet our data transparency standard. Its privacy policy does not reference COPPA and does not reference FERPA.
8 of 35 checks passed
Evaluated July 2026
View privacy policy →View all 35 checks
Parent Access3/8
Does the policy mention parents specifically?
““ you ” are an educator, school administrator, parent or guardian, or other adult user”
Can parents view their child's data?
“Policy redirects to a separate notice for child data practices; viewing is not mentioned here.”
Can parents modify their child's data?
“Not mentioned in this policy, redirects to a separate privacy notice for student data.”
Can parents delete their child's account?
“Not explicitly mentioned in this policy; refers to a separate child privacy notice.”
Is there a dedicated Children's Privacy section?
“Contains a dedicated section titled "Children Under the Age of 16".”
Does it reference COPPA compliance?
“COPPA is not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.”
Does it reference FERPA compliance?
“FERPA is not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.”
Is parental consent required for child accounts?
“"collected or received Personal Information from a child under 16 years of age without verification of parental consent"”
Data Portability0/5
Can users access their personal data?
“The text does not explicitly address users accessing their personal data due to section truncation.”
Can users download/export their data?
“Data exporting or downloading is not mentioned in the provided text.”
Is there a self-service data access tool?
“A self-service data access tool is not mentioned in the provided text.”
Is a specific data format mentioned for export?
“No specific export format is mentioned in the provided text.”
Is there an API for data access?
“API access to data is not mentioned in the provided text.”
Data Minimization1/6
Is data collection itemized?
“"Specifically... may collect the following: Your full name. Your e-mail address. Your telephone number."”
Can the app be used without a real name?
“Not mentioned; policy explicitly lists "Your full name" as collected.”
Can the app be used without an email?
“Not mentioned; policy explicitly lists "Your e-mail address" as collected.”
Does it state collection is limited to what is necessary?
“The policy does not explicitly state that data collection is limited to what is strictly necessary.”
Is IP address anonymized or truncated?
“Mentions collecting IP address but does not state it is anonymized or truncated.”
Is location tracking explicitly excluded?
“Location tracking is not explicitly excluded; policy mentions collecting "general geographic region".”
Third-Party Protection3/7
Does it explicitly state no selling of data?
“"please know that we do not currently sell data triggering that statute’s opt-out requirements."”
Are third-party providers named?
“"We use Google Analytics to track and analyze certain traffic and usage statistics"”
Are providers contractually restricted?
“Contractual restrictions for third-party providers are not explicitly mentioned in the text.”
No-targeted-advertising commitment?
“Policy states it does use data for "displaying targeted offers and ads to you".”
Is AI/ML data sharing addressed?
“AI or machine learning data sharing is not mentioned in the policy text.”
Child-specific sharing restriction?
“Child-specific sharing restrictions are not detailed in this policy (redirects to a separate policy).”
Cookies/tracking limited or opt-out?
“"For more information on how to disable certain tracking technologies, please visit the Network Advertising Initiative..."”
Deletion & Retention0/5
Can users delete their account?
“The ability for users to delete their account is not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.”
Self-service deletion mechanism?
“A self-service deletion mechanism is not mentioned in the provided policy text.”
Specific data retention timeline?
“Specific data retention timelines are not mentioned in the text.”
Auto-deletion of inactive accounts?
“Auto-deletion of inactive accounts is not mentioned in the provided policy text.”
Post-deletion handling described?
“Post-deletion handling procedures are not mentioned in the provided policy text.”
Advertising1/4
Advertising model explicitly disclosed?
“"displaying targeted offers and ads to you on our Platform and third-party sites that you visit"”
Free from third-party advertisements?
“Policy states they use data for "displaying targeted offers and ads to you on our Platform and third-party sites".”
Children excluded from ad targeting?
“Refers to a separate policy for the children's platform and does not explicitly address child ad targeting here.”
Ad-free option available?
“An ad-free option is not mentioned in the provided policy text.”
What This Means
The policy review did not meet our data transparency standard. The checks above show the documented findings and unknowns. A missing statement does not establish how the app handles data in practice.
About this evaluation: Based on automated analysis of #WinAtSocial Program's privacy policy using the Common Sense Privacy Program framework. Results describe the policy disclosures we assessed; unknown checks are excluded from scores. Privacy policies can change. This review reflects the version we analyzed and does not determine legal compliance.
Sources and review method
TLS combines product information and editorial analysis to explain how #WinAtSocial Program works, its tradeoffs, and the questions to ask before choosing it. Product features, an instructional rationale and evidence of learning outcomes are different kinds of information.
Formal Learning Standard assessment: not yet completed. Data Transparency findings are reported separately and do not establish learning effectiveness. Read our methodology.
Frequently Asked Questions About #WinAtSocial Program
Is #WinAtSocial Program free?
No, #WinAtSocial Program is not free. It is an enterprise-level, school-wide curriculum that requires a paid district or school subscription. The Social Institute requires administrators to contact their sales team directly for a customized pricing quote based on student enrollment and implementation needs. It is not available as a direct-to-consumer purchase for individual parents or families.
Is #WinAtSocial Program good for middle and high schoolers?
Yes, #WinAtSocial Program is highly effective for middle and high school students. Older students often tune out outdated warnings about internet safety. This program succeeds by utilizing monthly updates that focus on current trends, social media platforms, and real news stories that adolescents actually care about. By elevating student voices and focusing on peer-to-peer discussion, it respects their developmental need for autonomy while guiding them toward healthier digital habits.
What does #WinAtSocial Program teach?
#WinAtSocial Program teaches digital citizenship, online safety, and social-emotional skills. It moves beyond basic internet safety rules to address complex modern issues like screen time management, digital footprint awareness, cyberbullying, and the mental health impacts of social media. The curriculum is mapped to CASEL competencies, meaning it explicitly teaches self-awareness, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making through the lens of modern technology use.
Is #WinAtSocial Program safe for kids?
Yes, #WinAtSocial Program is safe for kids. It is a secure, school-administered platform designed specifically to protect student privacy while discussing sensitive topics. Students interact with the platform under the direct supervision of a classroom teacher. It does not connect students to external social media networks, nor does it allow unsupervised peer-to-peer messaging that could lead to cyberbullying within the platform itself.
Has The Learning Standard evaluated #WinAtSocial Program?
No, #WinAtSocial Program is currently pending evaluation by our team. While we have analyzed its pedagogical framework and instructional design based on available documentation, it has not yet undergone our rigorous, empirical review process. You can read more about how we test educational tools in our methodology section to understand how we eventually assign our final effectiveness ratings.
How does #WinAtSocial Program compare to traditional cyberbullying assemblies?
#WinAtSocial Program is significantly more effective than one-off cyberbullying assemblies. Learning science demonstrates that isolated, mass-instruction events rarely produce long-term behavioral changes. By contrast, this program embeds digital citizenship into the weekly or monthly school routine. This ongoing, scenario-based approach allows for deeper cognitive processing, peer norming, and continuous reinforcement of positive digital behaviors that a single yearly assembly simply cannot provide.
Is #WinAtSocial Program COPPA compliant?
A COPPA reference was not found in the reviewed privacy policy. This does not determine whether the app complies with COPPA. Policy review note: COPPA is not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Is #WinAtSocial Program FERPA compliant?
A FERPA reference was not found in the reviewed privacy policy. This does not determine whether the app complies with FERPA. Policy review note: FERPA is not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Does #WinAtSocial Program have a children's privacy policy?
The reviewed policy includes a dedicated children's privacy section. Policy review note: Contains a dedicated section titled "Children Under the Age of 16".
Does #WinAtSocial Program sell student data?
The reviewed policy states that the app does not sell data. This is a policy statement; actual data practices were not verified. Policy review note: "please know that we do not currently sell data triggering that statute’s opt-out requirements."
Can you delete your data from #WinAtSocial Program?
Account deletion was not documented in the reviewed privacy policy. This does not establish whether deletion is available. Policy review note: The ability for users to delete their account is not explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Follow TLS Research
Subscribe to future TLS research updates: app reviews, findings, and what the evidence shows.
Screenshots
Take Action
For #WinAtSocial Program
If you represent The Social Institute and have a correction or new evidence, send the relevant source so we can review and update this page.
Submit a correction